America’s Last Chance to Lead in Fusion Energy
The ability to generate near-limitless energy would amount to a strategic advantage rivaling the greatest breakthroughs of the twentieth century
WASHINGTON, DC – In the late nineteenth century, America’s cities were dark. Gas lamps flickered in homes and along streets, while coal-fired engines powered industry, and steam propelled trains. Then the race to electrify the country began – a fierce competition between Thomas Edison, Nikola Tesla, and George Westinghouse that ultimately redefined modern life. Today, we stand on the cusp of a similarly momentous energy transformation, powered by fusion energy. But this time it is a competition between countries, not innovators, that will make all the difference.
Electrification didn’t happen overnight, nor was it inevitable. It was made possible by a mix of private innovation, government investment, and national ambition. But once the United States committed to it, the process became unstoppable. As factories, businesses, and homes were electrified, a new era of American dominance dawned.
Likewise, the race to harness fusion energy is not only about scientific discovery; it is about who will dominate the future of energy. If the US leads, fusion power plants could provide abundant, clean, and safe energy for generations of Americans, breaking the country’s dependence on fossil fuels and insulating it from global energy shocks. But if America fails to meet this moment, it will find itself buying fusion machines from China, just as it now imports Chinese solar panels, electric-vehicle (EV) batteries, and rare-earth minerals.
Fusion – when two light atoms fuse to form a new, heavier atom, releasing a huge amount of energy – moved to the forefront of the global energy transition only recently. For decades, it was viewed as a grand but remote scientific ambition. While researchers made slow but steady progress in replicating the reactions that power the sun and stars, harnessing them to produce limitless, carbon-free power seemed to be a distant dream.
An inflection point came in 2022, when scientists at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory’s National Ignition Facility achieved a controlled fusion reaction that produced more energy than it consumed, proving that fusion power is theoretically possible and within reach. Now, researchers are doing more than running experiments; they are laying the groundwork for real power-generation systems.
The race to harness fusion energy will be decided not by physics, but by engineering, infrastructure, and industrial capacity. The first country to bring fusion power to the grid, not the first to achieve fusion reactions in a lab, will decide how the world’s next great power source is deployed and dominate a potential multi-trillion-dollar industry, reshaping its own economy in the process.
There was a time when the US set the pace for every major technological revolution. It built the first light bulbs, the first airplanes, the first computers, and put a man on the moon. But it is China that is moving aggressively to win the fusion race, investing heavily in research and development and positioning itself to control the supply chains that will enable large-scale fusion deployment. Chinese laboratories have already set records in sustaining fusion reactions, and state-backed initiatives are seeking to secure control over tritium, one of the fuels that will power future reactors. The US is falling behind.
We have seen this pattern before – first with solar panels, then with batteries, and now with EVs. In each case, American innovation laid the foundation for new industries, but it was China that implemented a long-term strategy aimed at cementing its dominance over manufacturing and supply chains. And in each case, the US ended up dependent on foreign production.
When it comes to fusion, the stakes are even higher. The ability to generate near-limitless energy would amount to a strategic advantage rivaling the greatest breakthroughs of the twentieth century. Beyond acquiring powerful economic leverage over the US, a China that leads in fusion would gain considerable geopolitical clout. If China also leads in AI, quantum computing, and advanced manufacturing – as it is positioning itself to do – its influence will be unmatched.
US policymakers are well aware of the risks a dominant China would pose, as reflected in recent national security strategies and economic and foreign policies. They also know that energy independence is critical to US security; it has been a priority for decades. But they have yet to recognize the critical importance of leading on fusion. This must change – and fast.
Harnessing fusion energy is not a challenge for the next presidential administration or even the next Congress. The decisions the US makes in the next five years will determine whether it wins the fusion race – or watches others run away with the prize.
